Profile

Registered: 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in file site Let's consider the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.    Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.    Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.    The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.    However, you have to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.    There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.      Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.    It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.    It is because it is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.      Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.  It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.  If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.    OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.    By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the thought of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the perfect solution is.    The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, that may be fully built in Soho, so the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.      It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.    Rental vs. Construction.      Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files online at a fixed monthly cost. Which means that the use of web hard has become common.        But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. p2p 순위 When it came out, many people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.        The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it.      In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.        NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.        Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Subsequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.      Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one based on the reality and needs.

Website: https://www.nandadisk.com

Forums

Topics Started: 0

Replies Created: 0

Forum Role: Participant